Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Review by Dr. JERRY TENENBAUM
 CRA Forum : Review by Dr. JERRY TENENBAUM
Subject Topic: Review By Dr. Jerry Tenenbaum Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
elisia
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: January 30 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 42
Posted: November 14 2006 at 12:42am Quote elisia

  
November, 2006 - CRA Journal Club Review by Dr. JERRY TENENBAUM
The ratio of circulating osteoprotegerin to RANKL in early rheumatoid arthritis predicts later joint destruction.
Geusens PP. Landewe RB. Garnero P. Chen D. Dunstan CR. Lems WF. Stinissen P. van der Heijde DM. van der Linden S. Boers M. Journal Article. Multicenter Study. Randomized Controlled Trial] Arthritis & Rheumatism. 54(6):1772-7, 2006 Jun
.


Jerry Tenenbaum
M.D., FRCPC
Editorial by 

Dr. Jerry Tenenbaum

INTRODUCTION

It has been proposed that a mechanism of bone destruction could be dissociated from inflammation

At pannus invasion sites, find cells with specific surface markers for osteoclasts

RANKL & OPG

NORMAL BONE REMODELING:   RANKL and its naturally occurring decoy receptor, OPG, play key roles
HUMAN RA & ANIMAL MODELS OF RA : RANKL and OPG play key roles  (as well as in erosive PsA and multiple myeloma)

OPG & RANKL

RANKL – promotes osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast activity  (induces osteoclastic bone destruction)
OPG – inhibits osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast activity  (prevents binding of RANKL with receptor, RANK)

RANKL & OPG
It is the relative levels of expression of RANKL and OPG locally which regulate bone resorption

Useful to express this as a ratio
     RANKL:OPG

    "PULLING RANK"
    Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB
    literally....
    Pulling Rank
    New England Journal of Medicine from Feb. 2006

    In Rheumatoid Arthritis...

    In RA

    RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    • Find  levels of RANKL and OPG in joints and sera of RA patients  (?clinical relevance)
    • Inflammation and osteoclastogenesis are different processes in the joints
    • Proinflammatory cytokines are major cofactors in differentiation and activation of osteoclasts
    DISSOCIATION
    • UNLIKELY THAT JOINT DESTRUCTION IN RA WOULD OCCUR IN ABSENCE OF INFLAMMATION
    • INFLAMMATION MAY OCCUR IN ABSENCE OF JOINT DESTRUCTION
    Some recent studies show this. Dissociation (infl. improves but damage occurs in some patients)

    The ratio of circulating osteoprotegerin to RANKL in early rheumatoid arthritis predicts later joint destruction.
    Geusens PP. Landewe RB. Garnero P. Chen D. Dunstan CR. Lems WF. Stinissen P. van der Heijde DM. van der Linden S. Boers M. Journal Article. Multicenter Study. Randomized Controlled Trial] Arthritis & Rheumatism. 54(6):1772-7, 2006 Jun

    HYPOTHESIS

    THERAPY has been shown in a cohort of early RA patients to influence increased levels of bone resorption markers in early RA.

    Hypothesis: in patients with early untreated RA, serum OPG:RANKL at baseline (a measure of osteoclast activation) is negatively associated with progression of joint damage

    Also, it is of interest to do an analysis of relationship of this ratio to parameters of inflammation

    ABSTRACT:

    OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that may result in debilitating joint deformities with destruction of bone and cartilage. Inflammation is still considered the pivotal inducer of both components of joint damage. Results of recent animal studies suggested a prominent contribution of osteoclastic bone resorption that could be dissociated from inflammation. RANKL and its natural decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin (OPG), play key roles in osteoclast activation. In a group of patients with early RA not treated with disease-modifying drugs, we tested the hypothesis that osteoclast activation, reflected by the serum OPG:RANKL ratio at baseline, is negatively associated with progression of bone damage, independent of inflammation.
    METHODS: OPG and RANKL levels, together with a parameter of inflammation (first-year time-averaged erythrocyte sedimentation rate [tESR]), were measured in 92 patients with newly diagnosed early active RA who were participants in a randomized study. The tESR and the OPG:RANKL ratio were evaluated for the ability to predict 5-year radiographic progression of joint damage.

    PATIENTS
    • 92/155 patients with available serum at baseline (before Rx instituted) in COBRA study
    • COBRA  (56 week of early RA which was highly active) (SSz + MTx with early CS vs. SSz alone) with freedom to alter Rx after 56 wks and follow up for 5 years.
    OUTCOME MEASURES
    • Primary : radiographic progression over 5 years (hands and feet at 1 yr intervals scored by modified Sharp/van der Heijde method (0-448)by 2 readers (mean score)
    • Secondary: progression rates during different time intervals (0-1year; 0-1 years; 1 to 2 years)
    METHODS
    • RANKL & OPG baseline levels: (blinded)  by Capture ELISA with 2 Abs detecting different epitopes  (OPG by commercial kit and RANKL by Amgen).
    • tESR = first-year time-averaged ESR (6 equally spaced values – to incorporate effects of Rx on inflammation)
    • Statistics:  logistic regression analysis
    PATIENTS
    • AGE: 50 ± 12 YEARS
    • DISEASE DURATION: 5.2 ± 4.6 MONTHS
    • W:M = 59:31
    • RF + : 75%
    • ESR: 51 ±30 mm/hr
    • HAQ score: 1.4 ± 0.7 (0-3)
    • DISEASE ACTIV. SCORE: 6.1 ± 1.0 (0-9)
    • SWOLLEN JT COUNT: 13 ± 8
    • TENDER JT COUNT: 24 ± 12
    • RADIOGRAPHIC DAMAGE (>4 Sharp units) : 44% AT BASELINE and 65% showed significant x-ray progression (>2 Sharp units/yr  over 5 yrs)
    Table 1



    Table 2

    RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION
    • Median x-ray progression was 4.1 Sharp units/yr
    • X-ray progression moderately associated with baseline ESR (Spearman’s ñ=0.44, P<0.001) and more strongly associated with first-year tESR (Spearman’s p=0.50, P<0.001)
    • Weakly associated with RANKL level (Spearman’s p=0.17, P=0.08) but not with OPG level.
    • A stronger negative association was observed with OPG:RANKL ratio (Spearman’s ñ = -0.38, P=.001)
    Table 3


    OTHER CORRELATIONS


    • Baseline ESR correlated weakly with the baseline RANKL level(ñ=0.17. P=0.08) and the baseline OPG (ñ=0.23, P=0.017) but did not correlate with OPG:RANKL ratio (ñ=0.01, P=0.91)
    • OPG:RANKL ratio did not correlate with baseline radiographic damage (ñ=-0.013, P NS)
    • First-year tESR and baseline OPG:RANKL ratio seemed to add to each other’s effect on radiographic progression
    Figure 1

    ADDITIVE EFFECT
    • Radiographic progression was highest (median 26 Sharp units/year) in patients with a high first-year tESR and a low OPG:RANKL ratio
    • Radiographic progression was lowest (median 1 Sharp unit/year) in patients with a low first-year tESR and a high OPG:RANKL ratio<>
    5-YEAR RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION (by multiple regression analysis)
    • First-year tESR (â=0.38, P<0.001)
    • OPG:RANKL ratio (â=0.36, P<0.001)
    • Equally and independently contributed to explaining the variation in radiographic progression
    • No relevant interaction between the tESR and OPG:RANKL ratio
    • The effects of these 2 were independent of treatment allocation
    • Adding ‘baseline damage’ to the regression model did NOT influence the relationship between the OPG:RANKL ratio and the 5-year radiographic progression
      Nor
    • The relationship between the tESR and 5-year progression
    t:ESR + OPG:RANKL ratios in various
    combinations for 5-Year
    x-ray progression (>2 Sharp units/yr)

    • Could discriminate patients with 5-year x-ray progression from patients with 5-year x-ray stability (shaded area)
    • Positive predictive value was 0.86 and negative predictive value was 0.67
    • For this optimal combination, odds ratio (OR) for x-ray progression was 12.5 (95% CI 4.3-36.0)

    Table 4

    ALL RISK FACTORS
    (multivariate analysis)
    • Patients with high level of RANKL at baseline had an OR of 4.4 (1.5-13) for long-term x-ray progression (>2 Sharp units/yr)
    • Patients with high level of OPG at baseline had an OR of 0.29 (0.10-0.85)
    • X-ray progression score was highest in group of patients with a high level of RANKL and a low level of OPG (8 Sharp units/yr) and was lowest in the group of patients with a low level of RANKL and a high level of OPG (2 Sharp units/yr)
    • Secondary Analysis: Different progression intervals as dependent variables for tESR and OPG:RANKL ratio did not change the results
    DISCUSSION 1
    • Inflammation (tESR)
    • Osteoclast activation (circ OPG/RANKL)
    Are additive on long-term radiographic progression in patients with early RA

    These effects are shown in this study to be statistically partly independent



    DISCUSSION 2

    OPG/RANKL:
    • In multiple myeloma, the ratio is 0.67
    • In RA, ratio (this study) is 1.2
    • In controls, ratio (this study) is 3.0

    • In erosive PsA, can demonstrate migration of circulating osteoclast precursors to the inflamed synovium and to SUBCHONDRAL BONE with subsequent exposure to RANKL

    DISCUSSION 3



    QUESTION: Why do some patients with high degree of disease activity not develop x-ray joint damage whereas others with or without significant inflammation show rapid progression of damage?


    DISCUSSION 4
    One possible Answer:

    Permissive levels of RANKL:

       -in vitro, need enough to have TNFá-stimulated macrophages to induce osteoclastogenesis
       -animal data – synergistic effect of mechanisms underlying  inflammation (TNFá  and RANKL)  and those underlying destruction

    DISCUSSION 5
    Critical amounts of RANKL must be present for TNF to be able to accelerate bone destruction

    OPG Rx protects against erosions in TNFá transgenic mice with arthritis
    RANKL-knockout mice remain free of erosions in animal models, despite persistent inflammation

    DISCUSSION 6


    Osteoclasts are an important mechanism of joint destruction in RA
    Osteoclasts provide an explanation for the clinically suspected partial dissociation between inflammation and joint destruction

    DISCUSSION 7

    • RANKL is a specific constitutive feature in a proportion of patients (and a high early level at baseline predicts a 5 year progression of damage)
    • The balance between activation signals (RANKL) and protective signals (OPG) (these are genetically determinable) determines long-term outcome
    DISCUSSION 8
    • The pro-erosive effects of (mediators of inflammation) then superimpose on the effects of osteoclasts
    DISCUSSION 9
    • Existing baseline damage is an important known predictor of radiographic progression of damage
    • This study found that despite this variable, OPG:RANKL ratio was predictive (ie  a marker of) independently of radiographic progression

    DISCUSSION 10

    PROBLEM
    • OPG:RANKL ratio and 5-year x—ray progression of damage is neither modified nor confounded by treatment
    • This is at odds with previous study of the same cohort showing glucocorticoids as part of intensive combination therapy has inhibitory effects on 5- year x-ray progression (osteoclasts and therapeutic impact on them require further study)
    DISCUSSION 11

    What delivers RANKL  ‘on site’?

       - activated T cells
       - synoviocytes

    Both have been shown to secrete RANKL


    DISCUSSION 12

    Therapeutic agents (Mtx, SSx, Infliximab) have been shown to suppress RANK expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (capable of osteoclast formation)

    From Abstract

    RESULTS: The first-year tESR and the OPG:RANKL ratio, as measured at baseline, independently predicted 5-year radiographic progression of joint damage (both P < or = 0.001). Progression of radiographic damage was greatest in patients with a high tESR and a low OPG:RANKL ratio and was lowest in patients with a low tESR and a high OPG:RANKL ratio.

    CONCLUSION:
    This study in patients with early untreated RA is the first to confirm the findings in animal models of arthritis, that radiographic progression of the bone component of joint destruction is dependent on both inflammation (tESR) and osteoclast activation (the OPG:RANKL ratio).

    Both signals deliver pro-erosive effects
    progression of joint damage and inflamation can, in part, be dissociated

    THERAPEUTIC
    IMPLICATIONS ???


    Supress
    Inflammation

    Supress bone resorption
    Figure 2



    Learning Objectives
    1. To understand an important mechanism of joint damage in rheumatoid  arthritis.

    2. To understand the roles of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and RANKL in the  damage of bone in rheumatoid arthritis.

    3. To identify the ratio of OPG/RANKL as a potential marker predicting  damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.



    Click HERE Full Text Article (PDF)



    November, 2006
    Back to Top View elisia's Profile Search for other posts by elisia
     
    uddin
    CRA Members
    CRA Members


    Joined: January 30 2006
    Online Status: Offline
    Posts: 3
    Posted: November 14 2006 at 10:49pm Quote uddin

    Jerry:Good paper and nice graduation picture.
    How do you explain bone erosion that varies from
    joint to joint with active disease presumably with
    appropiate serum RANKL:OPG ratio?Is it because
    the erosion is determined by the local ratio in the
    joint?
    Jamal Uddin
    Back to Top View uddin's Profile Search for other posts by uddin
     
    dickson
    CRA Members
    CRA Members


    Joined: January 30 2006
    Online Status: Offline
    Posts: 3
    Posted: December 31 2006 at 10:36am Quote dickson

    Do we Know if the ratio varies according to joint distribution JRD
    Back to Top View dickson's Profile Search for other posts by dickson
     

    If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
    If you are not already registered you must first register

      Post ReplyPost New Topic
    Printable version Printable version

    Forum Jump
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot create polls in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum